Reactive vs. Proactive, in Identifying and Mitigating Risks
May 28th, 2010, Elaine
Too many companies and organizations are *reactive* rather than *proactive* in identifying and mitigating risks. It amazes me how businesses fail to learn the lessons they see in the news every day.
When the Nigerian would-be terrorist tried to blow up a plane on Christmas Day 2009 with explosives stashed in his underwear, I, like many others, wondered how TSA/Homeland Security could have missed that. There are explosives-detecting machines in many airports – the devices the size of a phone booth that blows air at you – but they’re not in *all* airports. I don’t know whether the airport at which he boarded had those devices, but even if they didn’t, I’ll bet they made him take off his shoes.
It’s been nearly ten years since the Shoe Bomber tried to blow up a plane. Perhaps the lesson at that time was not, “Hey, you can blow up planes with explosives hidden in your shoes,” but “You can blow them up with explosives hidden *anywhere* in your clothing.” Now that we’ve figured out what WMD one’s Fruit-Of-The-Looms can be, we should take this a step further and remember the lessons learned back in the 1970s when people tried to smuggle drugs internationally by swallowing packets of heroin. See where I’m going with this? Bring on the full body scan machines, which we should have brought on after the Shoe Bomber, but make sure they can look deep enough. Don’t wait for someone to blow up a plane with swallowed explosives. You can bet someone’s working out that angle in a cave in Afghanistan right now.
Now you can’t bring liquids onto a plane, or if you do, they can’t be more than three ounces and must be stored in a Ziploc bag. (What, to make it more inconvenient for the terrorist to have to remove it first?) How does TSA *know* the liquid inside isn’t dangerous? They never check *mine*. It could be acid, poison, nitroglycerine, who knows. Do we have to wait for someone to create havoc with a TSA-approved hand lotion travel bottle?
I don’t mean to pick on TSA/Homeland Security particularly (or to angle for a spot on the no-fly list – that’s shampoo, really! When no one can wash their hair the terrorists have won!) but it’s one example of many that I see in the news headlines of organizations that spend more time closing the barn door rather than making sure the horse doesn’t escape to begin with.
Every day I speak with people all over North America who say they don’t have an interest in ERM or doing regular risk assessments, or senior management doesn’t think it’s necessary, or they lost the budget again for it, or they just don’t see the value. Because volcanoes, underwater oil gushers, terrorists and mysteriously faulty brakes happen to *other* companies, right?
By: Nicole Chardenet, Inside Sales
Filed Under: BPSResolver Blog | 0 Comments
